Seeing there is nothing that is so troublesome to mathematical practice… than the multiplications, divisions, square and cubical extractions of great numbers, which besides the tedious expense of time are… subject to many slippery errors, I began therefore to consider [how] I might remove those hindrances.

*John Napier, A Description of the Wonderful Canon of Logarithms*

At the end of 1617 in Edinburgh after the death of John Napier, was published (in the Latin language, which was a common practice then) his small book—*Rabdologiae seu Numerationis per Virgulas libri duo*. Looking to ease his own difficulties in calculating logarithmic tables, and impatient with the tedious and error-prone process of working with large numbers, Napier invented several mechanical methods of simplifying and speeding up multiplication, the most famous being special rods, later known as *Napier’s bones*. Besides the *virgulas* or *rods*, in his book John Napier described *multiplicationes promptuario* (*promptuary of multiplication* or *lightning calculator*), and the *scacchiae abaco* or *chessboard abacus*.

Napier published a description of his inventions in *Rabdologiae*, the title of which he derived from the Greek ραβδoς (rod) and λόγος (word) (incidentally, this section of Napier’s work also contains the first printed reference to the decimal point). The reason for publishing the work is given by Napier in the dedication, where he says that *so many of his friends, to whom he had shown the numbering rods, were so pleased with them that they were already becoming widely used, even beginning to be used in foreign countries* (one of these *friends* was Alexander Seton, the Earl of Dunfermline and High Chancellor of Scotland).

As opposed to the title …*libri duo* (two books), actually the *Rabdologiae* consists of four parts (books), two basic, and two appendixes. Book I is a description of the calculating tool, Book II offers forty-seven pages of tables, examples, and general problems demonstrating the utility of the rods in solving questions of geometry and mechanics. Book III is an appendix on Napier’s *promptuary*, a more elaborate calculating device consisting of engraved rods and strips; and Book IV is an appendix of forty-one pages, devoted to so-called *arithmeticæ localis (location arithmetic).*

Napier apparently based his invention on a popular during this time method for multiplication, described in several books—e.g. in the book of the famous Italian mathematician Luca Paccioli *Summa de Arithmetica, Geometrica, Proportioni et Proportionalita* (Everything about Arithmetic, Geometry, and Proportion), printed in Venice in 1494. This method was called *gelosia* (jealousy) in Italian. Most probably these ancient methods for multiplication were invented by Indian mathematicians, then transferred to China and via Arabian Haliphat—to Europe. The *gelosia* method is as follows:

A grid of squares, divided into parts by a diagonal, must be cross-ruled, as the number of squares depends on the number of digits in factors, e.g. if we want to multiply 3-digital to 3-digital factor, then the grid must be 3 by 3 squares. To the upper side and right side of the grid must be written the two factors, and intermediate products are written in the squares in such a manner, that the diagonal divides the units from the tens. The units of the partial product (the digit from the right by the digit from the upper) are written on one side and the tens on the other, so that when a multiple consists of two figures they are separated by the diagonal. To get the final product, the numbers along the diagonals are added and the result is written to the left of the grid (senior digital positions) and below the grid (junior digital positions).

Let’s see an example, to multiply 456 by 128 (see the nearby figure).

As the two numbers are 3-positional, we have to draw a 3 x 3 grid, to the upper side we have to write 456 (first factor), and to the right side 128 (second factor). In the squares, divided by a diagonal, we have to write the products of a digit placed on the upper side of a particular column to the digit, placed on the right side, as in the upper left part of the square we have to write tens (if any), while in the lower right part, we have to write units. Then we have to prolong the diagonals and to add digits in every diagonal, starting with the units and if it is necessary, we make a carry to the next diagonal. In such a manner, we get the result—456 x 128 = 058368. The multiplication was done by means of addition.

Essentially, what Napier did (how often simple things are of genius!?), is that he made slips (columns) with all possible nine columns of squares of the *gelosia* grid, and thus he can put aside manual drawing of a grid and writing in squares. These slips are written on the surface of ten rods, later on, called *Napier’s rods* (the best sets of Napier’s numbering rods were made of ivory, so that they looked like bones, which explains why they are now known as *Napier’s bones*).

Let’s make a multiplication by means of Napier’s rods, e.g. 3105 x 6 (see nearby figure).

We arrange side by side four rods (for 3, 1, 0, and 5).

First, we have to take the row for factor 6 (marked with an arrow). We start from the right, taking initially zero from the lower right part of the first cell. It will be the first digit of the result. Then we have to add the three digits from the left part of the first cell with 0 from the right part of the second cell. Continuing to add the digits along the diagonals and we will get the proper result 18630.

During the multiplication of a number, which has identical digits, we have to use identical rods. That’s why Napier suggested rods take the form of a parallelepiped, on the four surfaces of which to be inscribed four digital columns of rods in such a manner, that the four faces of each rod contain multiples of one of the nine digits, and is similar to one of the slips just described, the first rod containing the multiples of 0, 1, 9, 8, the second rod of 0, 2, 9, 7, the third of 0, 3, 9, 6, the fourth of 0, 4, 9, 5, the fifth of 1, 2, 8, 7 (see the nearby figure), the sixth of 1, 3, 8, 6, the seventh of 1, 4, 8, 5, the eighth of 2, 3, 7, 6, the ninth of 2, 4, 7, 5, and the tenth of 3, 4, 6, 5. Each rod, therefore, contains on two of its faces factors of digits that are complementary to those on the other two faces, and the factors of a digit and its complement are reversed in position.

When the second factor is multi-digital, then intermediate products must be written manually, shifting one position leftwards, then intermediate products must be added (see the drawing below). After arranging rods for the multiplicand side by side, we have to multiply the multiplicand (46785399) by the units of the multiplier (96431). This result is 46785399 x 1 = 46785399. Then we have to multiply the multiplicand by the tens of the multiplier 46785399 x 3 = 140356197, shifting the result to one position left and continuing, while all digits of the multiplier will be used. Then we have to add manually the partial factors. It was a matter of time, someone to think about, that if we have an adding machine, the multiplication can be done without any thinking, and this happened only some years later—Wilhelm Schickard, who used Napier’s Rods in his *Rechenuhr*, made to assist Kepler in his astronomical calculations.

Obviously, the use of Napier’s rods is easy, but tedious when one wants to multiply two numbers each having two or more digits. That’s why Napier went further, and in book III of his *Rabdologiae* he described a more elaborate calculating device, consisting of engraved rods and strips (so-called *promptuary*). *Promptuary* comes from the Latin *promptuarium*, “a place where things are stored ready for use”.

The device consists of 200 (100 thick and 100 thin) rods, placed in a special box, called *promptuary* (one set consists of 10 rods for every digit). The tick rod is 5 mm thick, while the thin is 2,5 mm. The side surface of each rod is divided into ten squares and two rectangles (in the upper and lower part of the surface), in which are inscribed digits from 0 to 9. The squares are divided into triangles: these of thick rods—with diagonals from the upper right corner to the left lower, while the squares of the thin rods—from the left upper to the right lower (on the nearby figure you can see the part from two rods to the left is placed the thick rod for the digit 4, to the right is placed thin rod for the 7, cut off (missing) triangles are filled with black color).

Tick rods are filled with digits (or empty for zero), while on the surface of thin rods are cut-off triangle openings (without openings for zero). Squares of the rods, which are inscribed with digits from 1-9 (not 0), are divided into nine smaller squares, and each of these squares is divided in half into 3 triangles by means of a diagonal, parallel to the diagonal in the bigger square. In the triangles are inscribed digits according to the letters *a, b, c, d, e, f, g, i, and j*, as shown in the lower figure, following the rule:

On the surface of the thick rods are inscribed multiple numbers of digits, marked on the rod, as the digit of the rod is inscribed instead of the letter *a*, a doubled digit is inscribed instead of the letter *b,* and so on. If the multiple number has two digits, then tens are inscribed instead of the upper letters, while the units are inscribed instead of the appropriate lower letter (see the lower figure).

On the surface of the thin rod with header 1, the openings are cut off at the place of triangles, marked with the letter *a*, on the surface of the thin rod with header 2, the openings are cut off at the place of triangles, marked with the letter *b* and so on (as it is shown in the right square of the upper figure).

During the multiplication, the thick rod is leaned against the thin rod in such a manner, that the diagonals of the two big squares coincide (thin rods are rotated to 90 degrees). Then in the openings of the thin rod can be seen the digits from the product of the numbers, which are inscribed on these rods. In the next figure, you can see the multiplication of 7213 x 524. First must be arranged properly thick rods, according to the multiplicand 7213. Then the thin rods, according to the multiplier 524, are placed over and rotated to 90 degrees to the thick, as the diagonals of squares on the thick and thin rods are concurrent. The result can be shown by adding of visible digits (in the figure the digits are shown in the thick triangles).

In the description of the *promptuary* Napier specified, that it can be used for the division also. For this action, he suggests to be found first the reciprocal of one of the multipliers, then to be done multiplication with the *promptuary*.

Napier’s rods rapidly became popular in England. According to one Seth Partridge, a London-based surveyor and mathematical practitioner, these reckoning rods were easy to make in any material whatsoever; they could either be manufactured by oneself or bought in the London instrument shops:

*These speaking-Rods may be made either of Silver, Brasse, Ivorie, or Wood, as the maker and user of them best pleaseth, but they are most ordinarily made of good sollid Box, and being thereof made, they are as usefull as those made of any other substance whatsoever, Nay, I hold them more light and nimble then those made of Mettall; …Every practitioner may make them himselfe by cutting the faces of every one of the printed papers of the Rods, and so placed on a square piece of wood as before; or else they are ready made in Wood, by Master John Thompson…*

In the next centuries, a lot of inventors tried to improve and facilitate the work with Napier’s rods, starting with the above-mentioned Wilhelm Schickard in the early 1620s.

In the early 1650s, an attempt to make a tool with Napier’s rods made the French physicist, cartographer, and engineer Pierre Petit (1594-1677), a King Counsellor and *Intendant des Fortifications*. Petit placed paper strips with Napier’s rods and made a mechanism, the so-called *Arithmetical Cylinder* or *Tambour de Petit* (Cylinder of Petit) (see the nearby image), allowing the paper strips to be moved along the axes. The device he described in his book *Dissertations academiques sur la nature du froid et du chaud. Avec un Discourssur la construction & l’usage d’un Cylindre Arithmetique, inventé par le mesme Autheur* (Paris, 1653).

According to Petit, people ceased using Napier’s “beautiful invention” because “the multitude and embarrassment of those sticks, filled with numbers on all sides, proved prolonged and tedious.” Since Petit found this method of calculating still useful, and because it was “easier to improve on inventions than to become an inventor”, he designed long bands or ribbons of paper each containing all the multiples of Napier’s rabdology. Those long bands were then attached end to end and mounted on a wooden cylinder the size of a child’s drum or a hat, and of a length that depended on the number of bands one wished to have in order to make calculations with large numbers.

The reckoning principles were identical to Napier’s bones. Pierre Petit deemed these common enough by then that he wrote only a brief summary of how to proceed toward making a multiplication and a division.

Several years after Petit, in the late 1650s, a device with Napier’s rodes was developed by the famous German scientist Athanasius Kircher, and his pupil and friend Gaspar Schott.

In 1667 Sir Charles Cotterell (1615–1701), an English courtier and translator devised a calculating instrument (called *arithmetical compendium*) with Napier’s rods, which included a wire-and-bead abacus for adding the partial products.

In 1673 was published the book *The Description and Use of Two Arithmetick Instruments *of Samuel Morland. In this book are described two calculating devices, one of them, the so-called multiplying machine was based on Napier’s rods.

In the same year (1673) a *cylindre arithmetique *(Napier’s bones engraved on a cylinder) were used in the adding instrument (called *nouvelle machine d’arithmétique*) of René Grillet de Roven.

In 1727 in the book *Theatrum arithmetico-geometricum *of Jacob Leupold, was described a calculating tool (so-called *calculating drum*), based on Napier’s rods.

In 1728 the German scientist Johann Michael Poetius described in his book “Anleitung zu[r] arithmetischen Wissenschaft, vermittelst einer parallelen Algebra” (Instructions for arithmetic means of science, a parallel algebra) an instrument, composed of concentric moving circles (so-called *Mensula Pythagorica*), which seems to be a variation of the Napier’s bones and can not render more services than the multiplication table (on the nearby image is shown a sector of *Mensula Pythagorica*).

In 1789, the German bailiff and mathematician F. X. M. Prahll devised an instrument, which he called *Machina Arithmetica Portatilis* (portable arithmetical machine), and which was essentially the same as the *Mensula Pythagorica* of Poetius, except only that the movable circles were much larger and carried the numerals 1 to 100 so that with the aid of that instrument numbers could be added and subtracted up to 100.

An instrument (called *Rechenscheibe*, see the upper drawing), similar to *Mensula Pythagorica* of Poetius, was devised in 1790 by the German professor of mathematics in Berlin Johann Philipp Grüson (1768-1857).

One of the recent chapters in the development of Napier’s bones as a calculating instrument took place at the end of 1870s when the French mathematician François Édouard Anatole Lucas (1842–1891) presented to the *Académie Française* a problem on arithmetic, that caught the attention of Henri Genaille (1839–1903), a French civil engineer, employed by the railway system in Tours. Genaille, who was already quite well known for his invention of several different arithmetic aids (yet in 1878 he gave a lecture, discussing a version of Napier’s Rods, which avoided the need to carry from one position to another), solved Lucas’s problem and, in the process, essentially devised a different form of Napier’s rods. This instrument, presented in 1885, eliminated the need to carry digits from one column to the next when reading off partial products. Genaille demonstrated his instrument (so-called *Réglettes multiplicatrices*, *Reglettes Financieres* or *Réglettes de Genaille Lucas* – Genaille-Lucas rulers) in 1891. Lucas gave these rulers enough publicity that they became quite popular for a number of years and several instruments, based on the rulers have been manufactured.

Lucas gave glowing praise to co-inventor and invention alike:

“An engineer at the State Railways in Tours, Mr. Henri Genaille, obscure yesterday, illustrious tomorrow, had the exceedingly remarkable and ingenious idea of replacing these additions with very simple drawings which allow all these partial products to be instantly read. The maneuvering of these rods is as easy as that which consists in following a path through a labyrinth, by means of indicator arrows on posts placed at the crossroads; that is to say that we learn to use these rods in a minute at most”.

In fact, Genaille and Lucas marketed four boxed sets. The first, the one shown here, was for multiplication; the second, for division; the third, for financial calculations; and the last was a set of the classic Napier rods. The financial set is actually a special derivative of the division set, optimized for the single task of figuring daily interest for a given initial sum and annual interest rate.

The multiplication set of *Genaille-Lucas rulers* contains 11 strips. The physical size of the original set is: the black cardboard container is 12 x 19 x 1 cm, and the 11 rods each measure 1 x 1 x 17 cm. The first strip (marked with *Index *in the lower figure) has only one useful side, which corresponds to the multiplier. It has nine rectangles (for the digits from 1 to 9), as the height of each rectangle is proportional to the digit in it. The remaining ten strips have four useful sides, as each side of a particular strip is for a different digit of the multiplicand. In the upper part of the strip is inscribed the digit of the multiplicand, and the lower part of the strip is divided into two vertical columns.

The multiplication can be done, as the strips for all digits of the multiplicand are arranged side by side, then the result can be read from right to left (black triangles in the left column of the strip for each digit of the multiplicand), as first can be read units, then—tens and so on.

Let’s make a simple multiplication with the rulers (3271 by 4) (see the nearby figure). First, we have to arrange side by side the proper rulers for the multiplicand and index ruler, placing also to the left the ruler for 0. Then, starting with the fourth rectangle (this for the digit four) of the rightmost (index) ruler (the multiplier is 4) leftwards, we have to select the digit at the top of the rectangle (4 in this case) and then simply to follow the black arrows leftwards, reading off the digits as we come to them—4, 8, 0, 3, 1, and thus we have the product 13084. In contrast to Napier’s rods, the result was obtained without making any arithmetical operations.

The rulers for division are similar to the multiplication ones, except that the large arrows are replaced by a multitude of smaller ones.

Let’s say some words about Book IV of *Rabdologiae*, which is an appendix of forty-one pages, devoted to so-called *arithmeticæ localis (location arithmetic)*. This appendix contains one of the first explorations of binary arithmetic as a computation aid. *Location arithmetic* is a technique to do binary arithmetic using a chessboard-like grid. Using simple moves of counters on the board, Napier showed ways to multiply, divide, and even find the square roots of binary numbers. He was so pleased by his discovery that he said in the preface:

*…it might be well described as more of a lark than a labor, for it carries out addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and the extraction of square roots purely by moving counters from place to place*.

*Location arithmetic* uses a square grid where each square on the grid represents a value. Two sides of the grid are marked with increasing powers of two. Any inner square can be identified by two numbers on these two sides, one being vertically below the inner square and the other to its far right. The value of the square is the product of these two numbers. A very good description of location arithmetic can be found on the site of Mr. Stephan Weiss, www.mechrech.info.